What are trumps views on gay marriage

Donald Trump has had varying views on gay marriage in recent decades. Here's what to know ahead of his inauguration in However, the article gives no indication that Trump has shifted his views on marriage equality since , referencing past interviews in which he opposed marriage rights for same-sex. Before he was elected president, Trump told CNN's Jake Tapper in that he is "just for traditional marriage." But after being elected president in November , he said in an interview.

President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump both support same-sex marriage, although their views on the issue have evolved over the years.

PolitiFact FL: Where Trump and Biden stand on key LGBTQ+ issues | WLRN

Biden has pushed to expand open LGBTQ+. Donald Trump's views on same-sex marriage have changed over the years, leaving many in the LGBTQ+ community uncertain about what his presidency means for marriage equality. Transgender people, in particular, already face discrimination across nearly every aspect of their lives.

Based on his own campaign promises — and the detailed policy proposals of Project — we can expect a future Trump administration to deploy three tactics against LGBTQ rights. Moreover, the federal government overturning policies enacted by local and state officials can create a clear narrative for the media about a MAGA government ramming through unpopular and extreme policies around which to build political resistance.

Overall Response Courts. More On This Topic. In addition, borrowing from lessons learned from the struggle to maintain access to abortion care, we will advocate for states to create reliable, permanent funding streams to ensure that those who would otherwise be cut off from gender-affirming medical care due to the exclusion of such care from federal programs are still able to access care under state programs.

Access to gender-affirming care for youth Trump opposes youth access to gender-affirming care. Four years of the first Trump presidency had an enormous impact on the courts, including the Supreme Court. A second Trump administration would not be able to implement such a policy without Congress, making it likely that fair-minded people could prevent such a horror.

A second Trump administration would likely take the extreme, potentially devastating position that federal law and the Constitution require states and private actors to discriminate against transgender people in a variety of contexts. Get more news Live on. Grace Abels PolitiFact. These programs — and similar ones at a much larger scale — exemplify the kind of support for and investment in the health of transgender people that will become necessary at the state level in a second Trump administration.

States have adopted laws criminalizing their health care, attempting to ban them from public life, and even threatening to remove transgender youth from families that love and affirm them. We are clear-eyed about the challenging road we face in turning to the federal courts to stop these planned attacks on the LGBTQ community.

Transgender people are no strangers to government persecution, political slander, or the criminalization of gender nonconformity. Trump has promised to reinstate a "ban" on transgender people in the military if he is reelected. Categorically denying such health care would violate the Constitution and section of the Affordable Care Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in health care programs.

Trump news

The ACLU has litigated against claims that the First Amendment entitles businesses that are open to the public to discriminate against LGBTQ people, and would similarly oppose such arguments asserted by employers. This could strip LGBTQ people of protections against discrimination in many contexts, including employment, housing, education, health care, and a range of federal government programs. And people diagnosed with gender dysphoria or who had already undergone a transition could not enlist.

However, states can and should lay down clear markers that their own laws and constitutions require protection of transgender people both to provide practical protections at least for a time and to create the opportunity for political organizing and mobilization when and if the Trump administration tries to override those state protections. Britain's foreign aid: Where does the money go? Educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders.

The administration might also intervene in litigation to try to prevent state and local governments from enforcing nondiscrimination requirements where the defendant asserts a religious motivation for the discrimination. Although the coercive power of federal funding cannot be underestimated, a coordinated effort by multiple states could force a showdown between medical ethics and state law and a punitive and overreaching federal government.

Numerous studies also found that they face higher rates of disability, long-term health risks — including HIV — and substance-use disorders, all of which contribute to a mortality risk twice that of their cisgender peers.